PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FOLLOWING PAGE IS IN DRAFT
ORMGP v.2020 10km² sub-watershed map
The 3 million hectare ORMGP jurisdiction is subdivided to a number of 10km² sub-watersheds as a basis for hydrometeorological data analysis. Every sub-watershed has a defined topological order in which headwater sub-watersheds can easily be mapped to subseqential downstream sub-watersheds, and so on until feeding the great lakes. The intent here is to deem these sub-watersheds a “logical unit” for climatological and water budget analyses. Below is a description of the derivation the v.2020 OWRC 10km² sub-watershed map and its dervivatives including:
Below first describes the processing of a Provincial Digital Elevation Model (DEM) yielding a “hydrologically-correct” model of the ORMGP ground surface. From this information, the ORMGP region is poritionned into 2,813 ~10km² sub-watersheds.
Ground surface elevations were collected from the 2006 version of the Provincial (Ministry of Natural Resources) Digital Elevation Model (DEM). This is a 10x10m² DEM derived from 1:10,000 scale OBM base mapping based on photogrammetic elevation points and 5m contours where the photogrammetic elevation points did not exist. A 50x50m² Digital Elevation Model (DEM) is produced by merging the tiles shown below:
MNR 2006 Provincial DEM tiles shown in green.
Elevation data were up-scaled by taking the average of known elevations occurring within every 50x50m² cell. The resulting grid is a 5000x5000 50m-uniform cell grid, with an upper-left-corner origin at (E: 545,000, N: 5,035,000) NAD83 UTM zone 17.
An automated topological topological analysis is performed on the DEM.
While automated hydrological correction is quite powerful when appled to the Provincial DEM, there are in rare places where the algorithm fails to capture mapped flow paths (usually in flatter rural regions close to embanked roads). Fortunately, these errors can be easily corrected by imposing flow directions using flow vectors. For instance, flow paths can be “drawn-in” from polylines, where the vertex order specifies flow direction.
With the current version (2020), 10 flow corrections have been imposed and are saved in a set of shapefiles. There is at the moment 1 new flow path correction in queue and will be imposed for the next release. This is to say that this layer and its derivatives are continually being updated.
todo
An overlay analysis is the process of overlaying 2 or more spatial layers and capturing statistics associated with their relative coverage. In this case, the sub-watershed layer is overlain by Provincial land-use and surficial geology layers to obtain information like percent impervious, relative permeability, etc.
Provincial layers discussed in more detail below have in all cases been resampled to the 50x50m² grid associated with the hydrologically corrected DEM. It is from these rasters where the aggregation of watershed characteristics is computed.
The Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (2019) SOLRIS version 3.0 provincial landuse layer is employed to aggregate imperviousness and canopy coverage at the sub-watershed scale. In areas to the north, where the SOLRIS coverage discontinues, interpretation was applied by:
The dominant SOLRIS land use class (by area) is assignes the Land use class index for every 50x50m² grid cell.
Final 50x50m SOLRIS mapping
For any ~10km² sub-watershed and give a 50x50m² grid , there should be a set of roughly 4,000 SOLRIS land use class indices. Using a look-up system, the set of cells contained within a sub-watershed are assigned a value of imperviouseness, waterbody, wetland and canopy coverage (according to their SOLRIS index) and acculmulated to a sub-watershed sum.
| Index | Name | Imperviousness (%) | Canopy cover (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Open Beach/Bar | ||
| 21 | Open Sand Dune | ||
| 23 | Treed Sand Dune | 50 | |
| 41 | Open Cliff and Talus | ||
| 43 | Treed Cliff and Talus | 50 | |
| 51 | Open Alvar | ||
| 52 | Shrub Alvar | 25 | |
| 53 | Treed Alvar | 50 | |
| 64 | Open Bedrock | ||
| 65 | Sparse Treed | 40 | |
| 81 | Open Tallgrass Prairie | 10 | |
| 82 | Tallgrass Savannah | 35 | |
| 83 | Tallgrass Woodland | 85 | |
| 90 | Forest | 100 | |
| 91 | Coniferous Forest | 100 | |
| 92 | Mixed Forest | 100 | |
| 93 | Deciduous Forest | 100 | |
| 131 | Treed Swamp | 50 | |
| 135 | Thicket Swamp | 50 | |
| 140 | Fen | 25 | |
| 150 | Bog | 25 | |
| 160 | Marsh | 25 | |
| 170 | Open Water | ||
| 191 | Plantations – Tree Cultivated | 85 | |
| 192 | Hedge Rows | 85 | |
| 193 | Tilled | ||
| 201 | Transportation | 85 | |
| 202 | Built-Up Area– Pervious | 10 | 10 |
| 203 | Built-Up Area– Impervious | 90 | |
| 204 | Extraction–Aggregate | ||
| 205 | Extraction –Peat/Topsoil | 10 | |
| 250 | Undifferentiated |
Final 50x50m impervious mapping